Re: Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update
Date: 2017-02-10 17:11:38
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZqZAEy_-_P_Gmj8PerYj+o8g3iwmSU4508f_R=2a7Y_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> 11 There existed a race condition /where/ if CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was
> called on a column that had not been indexed before, then rows that were
> updated by transactions running at the same time as the CREATE INDEX
> CONCURRENTLY command /may not/ have been indexed incorrectly.

I think this is moot at this point, but "may not have been indexed
incorrectly" seems to have two negatives where there should be only
one.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Nullmeier 2017-02-10 17:18:13 Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing and Tuple Deforming (including JIT)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-10 17:07:15 Re: WIP: About CMake v2