| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: auto_explain sample rate |
| Date: | 2016-03-11 16:55:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZoRunWtv8zHiKUgmv193h0m40JXKY4i-SALgCk91MSUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> A bit late, but I think we should rename the GUC variable to
> "sampling_rate" (instead of sample_ratio) as that's what pgbench uses
> for the same thing. That'd be more consistent.
I like that idea. It seems like slightly better terminology.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitaly Burovoy | 2016-03-11 16:59:49 | Re: [PATH] Correct negative/zero year in to_date/to_timestamp |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-11 16:54:22 | Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command |