| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: auto_explain sample rate |
| Date: | 2016-03-11 16:33:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1457714026.4311.4.camel@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 15:11 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> >
> Applied with a minor word-fix in the documentation and removal of
> some unrelated whitespace changes.
A bit late, but I think we should rename the GUC variable to
"sampling_rate" (instead of sample_ratio) as that's what pgbench uses
for the same thing. That'd be more consistent.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2016-03-11 16:36:16 | Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-11 16:24:43 | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |