| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash index creation warning |
| Date: | 2015-06-26 15:38:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZm_cOPLLhyD9Ok8FC2S_yafCLG0v3iVA=s+KT=FwqVPw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think you should be testing RelationNeedsWAL(), not the
>> relpersistence directly. The same point applies for temporary
>> indexes.
>
> Indeed. Patch updated attached.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-26 15:40:27 | Re: Hash index creation warning |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-26 15:36:08 | Re: Conflict between REL9_4_STABLE and master branch. |