| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 |
| Date: | 2014-03-10 19:46:52 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZiS8NfjXoiE2F6ZS0nbA+NJg2ahx4f+2n=VHxVo3tFtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 11:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I've committed this patch now with a few further tweaks, leaving this
>> issue unaddressed. It may well be something that needs improvement,
>> but I don't think it's a big enough issue to justify holding back a
>> commit.
>
> Wait, does this mean Changesets is committed? Or only part of it?
The core of the feature was b89e151054a05f0f6d356ca52e3b725dd0505e53,
but that only allowed it through the SQL interface. The new commit,
8722017bbcbc95e311bbaa6d21cd028e296e5e35, makes it available via
walsender interface. There isn't a client for that interface yet, but
if you're wondering whether it's time to break out the champagne, I'm
thinking probably.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-03-10 19:46:53 | Re: extension_control_path |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-10 19:44:00 | Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() |