| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 |
| Date: | 2014-03-10 20:55:53 |
| Message-ID: | 531E26D9.9070304@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/10/2014 12:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 03/10/2014 11:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I've committed this patch now with a few further tweaks, leaving this
>>> issue unaddressed. It may well be something that needs improvement,
>>> but I don't think it's a big enough issue to justify holding back a
>>> commit.
>>
>> Wait, does this mean Changesets is committed? Or only part of it?
>
> The core of the feature was b89e151054a05f0f6d356ca52e3b725dd0505e53,
> but that only allowed it through the SQL interface. The new commit,
> 8722017bbcbc95e311bbaa6d21cd028e296e5e35, makes it available via
> walsender interface. There isn't a client for that interface yet, but
> if you're wondering whether it's time to break out the champagne, I'm
> thinking probably.
Yeah, that's my thoughts. Although I might wait for recvlogical. Will
put documentation wordsmithing on my todo list once Andres commits.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-10 21:08:56 | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 |
| Previous Message | Robert Berry | 2014-03-10 20:52:04 | Re: calculating an aspect of shared buffer state from a background worker |