Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Date: 2015-12-02 13:27:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZhmU0uFJBVSEHK_97YrbbX5ib=kzZz1J2d2qHmCA=tYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Well, it's December nearly, and we don't seem to be making much progress
>> towards pushing out 9.5.0. I see the following items on
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
>>
>> * Open Row-Level Security Issues
>>
>> Seems like what's left here is only documentation fixes, but they still
>> need to get done.
>
> These are mainly just documentation improvements which I'm working on,
> though the docs were recently updated and I need to incorporate Peter's
> changes which I wasn't exactly anticipating.

So, when do you foresee this documentation stuff getting taken care
of? We kinda need to do a release here. Is this really a blocker?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-12-02 13:36:06 Re: Gather node in OPTIMIZER_DEBUG output
Previous Message Dave Page 2015-12-02 13:07:29 Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers