Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Date: 2015-12-02 16:25:13
Message-ID: 565F1B69.1080104@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/02/2015 05:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>>> Well, it's December nearly, and we don't seem to be making much progress
>>> towards pushing out 9.5.0. I see the following items on
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
>>>
>>> * Open Row-Level Security Issues
>>>
>>> Seems like what's left here is only documentation fixes, but they still
>>> need to get done.
>>
>> These are mainly just documentation improvements which I'm working on,
>> though the docs were recently updated and I need to incorporate Peter's
>> changes which I wasn't exactly anticipating.
>
> So, when do you foresee this documentation stuff getting taken care
> of? We kinda need to do a release here. Is this really a blocker?
>

A feature does not exist without documentation.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-12-02 16:39:59 Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-02 16:07:58 psql ignores failure to open -o target file