Re: gcc5: initdb produces gigabytes of _fsm files

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gcc5: initdb produces gigabytes of _fsm files
Date: 2015-02-13 00:09:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZhXVvzD8ijHH-kr-e2+Oi=+kekkmvFR0o7_EZtOp_hbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> writes:
>>> gcc5 is lurking in Debian experimental, and it's breaking initdb.
>
>> Yeah, I just heard the same about Red Hat as well:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190978
>> Not clear if it's an outright compiler bug or they've just found some
>> creative new way to make an optimization assumption we're violating.
>
> Apparently, it's the former. See
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190978#c3
>
> I will be unamused if the gcc boys try to make an argument that they
> did some valid optimization here.

You're new here, aren't you?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-02-13 00:18:11 Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments
Previous Message Bo Tian 2015-02-12 23:46:18 question on Postgres smart shutdown mode