Re: dropping table in testcase alter_table.sql

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dropping table in testcase alter_table.sql
Date: 2011-07-09 02:27:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZd2Ai=a7bTbL0x9ZM0kOrXdtKaKXhfXb8ifs5tB92hQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think, tab1 and tab2 are too common names, for anyone to pick up for the
> tables. Also, the test alter_table.sql is dropping many other tables (even
> those which have undergone renaming), then why not these two?

Beats me, but I don't see any particular value to changing it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-07-09 02:51:58 Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-09 02:15:55 Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.1 - Consolidate routines to handle DropStmt