Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2022-01-04 14:37:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZZEyeCQf7y6D5XkaQ7zffHBUbDVfdKnsUc=sL4ptnbfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 12:12 PM tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/22/21 11:05 PM, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:
> > Please find the lz4 compression patch here that basically has:
> Please refer to this scenario , where --server-compression is only
> compressing
> base backup into lz4 format but not pg_wal directory
>
> [edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -Ft --server-compression=lz4
> -Xstream -D foo
>
> [edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ls foo
> backup_manifest base.tar.lz4 pg_wal.tar
>
> this same is valid for gzip as well if server-compression is set to gzip
>
> edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -Ft --server-compression=gzip4
> -Xstream -D foo1
>
> [edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ls foo1
> backup_manifest base.tar.gz pg_wal.tar
>
> if this scenario is valid then both the folders format should be in lz4
> format otherwise we should
> get an error something like - not a valid option ?

Before sending an email like this, it would be a good idea to read the
documentation for the --server-compression option.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-01-04 15:33:00 Re: Proposal: remove obsolete hot-standby testing infrastructure
Previous Message Joshua Brindle 2022-01-04 14:35:31 Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies