From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam() |
Date: | 2023-03-23 17:06:08 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZYxy4mu3o_6K1=dv2a8Vh7mjxuQBy32HuURFCkonBefw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 9:42 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmph. I didn't think very hard about that code and just assumed
> Himanshu had tested it. I don't have convenient access to a Big-endian
> test machine myself. Are you able to check whether using 0x00010019
> unconditionally works?
Oh, I see now you already pushed a fix. Thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-03-23 17:10:27 | Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-03-23 16:50:20 | Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete() |