Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com

Since Tom proposed the approach which Michael's patch takes, I'm
hoping he will review and commit this. If it is left to me to fix it,
I may just adopt a minimal fix.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company