Re: Reviewing freeze map code

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Date: 2016-08-05 13:56:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZUNKtxgSv5BFkDyKF_-TFv1bR7CX12T0qs1gPx8-EiJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-08-02 10:55:18 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>>
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Andres,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item.
>
> Well kinda (it was a partial fix for something not originally by me),
> but I'll deal with. Reading now, will commit tomorrow.

Thanks. I kept meaning to get to this one, and failing to do so.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-05 14:11:28 Re: regression test for extended query protocol
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-08-05 13:54:19 Re: Slowness of extended protocol