| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Slowness of extended protocol |
| Date: | 2016-08-05 13:54:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZJXi7b0Nu0K5Q95anjqXQQUaPJkAxzezDAkpnJS4ciCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> wrote:
>> Shay, why don't you use a profiler? Seriously.
>> I'm afraid "iterate the per-message loop in PostgresMain five times not
>> once" /"just discussing what may or may not be a problem..." is just
>> hand-waving.
>>
>> Come on, it is not that hard.
>
> I really don't get what's problematic with posting a message on a mailing
> list about a potential performance issue, to try to get people's reactions,
> without diving into profiling right away. I'm not a PostgreSQL developer,
> have other urgent things to do and don't even spend most of my programming
> time in C.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. I find your questions
helpful and interesting and I hope you will keep asking them. I think
that they are a valuable contribution to the discussion on this list.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-05 13:56:37 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-05 13:54:11 | Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off |