Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Date: 2013-05-15 13:05:13
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZNh+YwAm7cdoheij5ehr22Yfjch9F0a91a-Jdd_71UKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> I still think we should revert 9db7ccae2000524b72a4052352cbb5407fb53b02.
>> The argument that the system-provided program might be faster carries
>> very little weight for me --- "make install" is fast enough already.
>> It's not worth making a bunch of extension authors jump through hoops,
>> whether their style was bad or not.
>
> +1.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-05-15 13:26:08 Re: postgres_fdw foreign tables and serial columns
Previous Message Amit Langote 2013-05-15 13:04:44 Re: Logging of PAM Authentication Failure