Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Date: 2013-05-15 02:30:16
Message-ID: 20130515023015.GL4361@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> I still think we should revert 9db7ccae2000524b72a4052352cbb5407fb53b02.
> The argument that the system-provided program might be faster carries
> very little weight for me --- "make install" is fast enough already.
> It's not worth making a bunch of extension authors jump through hoops,
> whether their style was bad or not.

+1.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-05-15 02:43:06 Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Previous Message Amit Langote 2013-05-15 00:55:04 Update description in sysv_shmem.c