Re: Parallel copy

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Date: 2020-05-13 19:09:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZLK-qEqWojeOWxGNaA4gpo6W9vv=ZpY63ZaqK_72t23Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:01 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't understand why we need to do something special for combo CIDs
> if they are not generated during this operation?

Hmm. Well I guess if they're not being generated then we don't need to
do anything about them, but I still think we should try to work around
having to disable parallelism for a table which is referenced by
foreign keys.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-05-13 19:10:30 Re: tablespace_map code cleanup
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2020-05-13 18:08:37 Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration