Re: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments
Date: 2018-07-13 21:57:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZLAqLXCkp4Hi1VD9vbR0kzfVPT5Q6ErHg7Ox9aae4JQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Another idea that I have here, is to rework the page for monitoring
> stats so as we create one sub-section for each system view, and also one
> for the table of wait events. For the wait events, we could then
> completely remove the first category column which has morerows and
> divide the section into on table per event category.

+1 from me. I think I proposed that before.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-13 22:45:48 pgsql: Fix crash in contrib/ltree's lca() function for empty input arra
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-07-13 21:56:40 Re: pgsql: Fix parallel index and index-only scans to fall back to serial.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kefan Yang 2018-07-13 22:04:55 Fwd: GSOC 2018 Project - A New Sorting Routine
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-07-13 21:56:40 Re: pgsql: Fix parallel index and index-only scans to fall back to serial.