Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Date: 2012-07-20 19:51:04
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZKLjCQk9pBpNJ2gDD8wfm64b9XL-yRXFoN3kfEyUYfQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The Windows buildfarm members don't seem too happy with the latest
> patch.

I'm looking at this now, but am so far mystified. Something's
obviously broken as regards how the trigger flags get set up, but if
that were broken in a trivial way it would be broken everywhere, and
it's not. Will keep searching...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-07-20 19:52:27 Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-07-20 19:45:15 Re: Restrict ALTER FUNCTION CALLED ON NULL INPUT (was Re: Not quite a security hole: CREATE LANGUAGE for non-superusers)