| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-08-22 16:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZJjgmWND6dH3Cv5zmVivuh1qyo1Mp4qoG=wCw5WGhdTg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This feature shows source code for PL function when \df statement was used.
> I am not too sure, if this functionality is necessary - but I don't see any
> argument against. Sometimes it can be useful, mainly when we work with
> overloaded functions.
Wait, really? I thought Peter was complaining about the fact that it
*removed* that from the display.
He also complained about the fact that the subject line of this thread
and what the patch actually does have diverged considerably, which I
think is a fair complaint.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-08-22 16:35:19 | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-22 16:00:49 | Re: Typo in comment to function LockHasWaitersRelation() [master branch] |