| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallelizing the archiver |
| Date: | 2021-10-25 20:29:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZFq3bUxvpBYHKwii48-Ag4=bYMeCQbg1NXefESaurZew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> Alright, here is an attempt at that. With this revision, archive
> libraries are preloaded (and _PG_init() is called), and the archiver
> is responsible for calling _PG_archive_module_init() to get the
> callbacks. I've also removed the GUC check hooks as previously
> discussed.
I would need to spend more time on this to have a detailed opinion on
all of it, but I agree that part looks better this way.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-10-25 20:29:11 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-25 20:15:24 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |