Re: parallelizing the archiver

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallelizing the archiver
Date: 2021-10-25 20:38:44
Message-ID: BA1903BA-3FDE-4EA2-B239-EDC40EFDAB19@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/25/21, 1:29 PM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>> Alright, here is an attempt at that. With this revision, archive
>> libraries are preloaded (and _PG_init() is called), and the archiver
>> is responsible for calling _PG_archive_module_init() to get the
>> callbacks. I've also removed the GUC check hooks as previously
>> discussed.
>
> I would need to spend more time on this to have a detailed opinion on
> all of it, but I agree that part looks better this way.

Great. Unless I see additional feedback on the basic design shortly,
I'll give the documentation updates a try.

Nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2021-10-25 20:42:07 Re: Allow pg_signal_backend members to use pg_log_backend_memory_stats().
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-25 20:35:28 Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY