Re: Logical replication existing data copy

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/4/17 01:46, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> So I think we should do it, but it needs to be configurable, my original
>>> patch added GUC for it, Peter wanted it to be configurable per
>>> subscription. I guess we could add it as another option to the list of
>>> WITH (...) options for CREATE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
>>
>> I don't have a terribly well-considered opinion on this point just
>> yet, but my initial hunch is that Peter has the right idea.
>
> Basically, we need to have some way of setting this that makes sense in
> the global scheme of things. We don't want a situation where "sometimes
> it does this, sometimes it does that". I'm not set on any specific
> mechanism.

I think we are on the same page.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company