Re: Logical replication existing data copy

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Logical replication existing data copy
Date: 2017-03-07 16:39:22
Message-ID: 69053629-a6a9-f00c-d502-2cdb25025414@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/4/17 01:46, Robert Haas wrote:
>> So I think we should do it, but it needs to be configurable, my original
>> patch added GUC for it, Peter wanted it to be configurable per
>> subscription. I guess we could add it as another option to the list of
>> WITH (...) options for CREATE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
>
> I don't have a terribly well-considered opinion on this point just
> yet, but my initial hunch is that Peter has the right idea.

Basically, we need to have some way of setting this that makes sense in
the global scheme of things. We don't want a situation where "sometimes
it does this, sometimes it does that". I'm not set on any specific
mechanism.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2017-03-07 16:40:21 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2017-03-07 16:38:51 Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join