Re: getting rid of maintainer-check

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: getting rid of maintainer-check
Date: 2013-10-09 18:53:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ9Gp+2xFyDGnuosn=9DrMaWsGomL-bBFccei4X2T9gDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 22:41 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The maintainer-check target never really caught on, I think. Most
>> people don't run it, and that in turn annoys those who do. Also, it
>> doesn't provide much functionality.
>>
>> I propose that we get rid of it and roll the functionality into the
>> regular build.
>
> Here is a patch for that. I also integrated Andrew's Perl version of
> duplicate_oids.
>
> The MSVC build needs to be updated separately, if they want to have that
> same functionality.

These patches look OK to me, and everyone who has commented has been
in favor of this proposal. I'll mark this Ready for Committer.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-09 18:56:48 Re: Backup throttling
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-09 18:51:48 Re: [PATCH] pg_upgrade: Split off pg_fatal() from pg_log()