Re: blkreftable.c needs more sanity checks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: blkreftable.c needs more sanity checks
Date: 2026-07-15 15:36:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ6rgU8KtCKEhcajMzc0t+BvT7L2JqdhiUpDTejd9c4bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 7:31 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> A more likely scenario is that you are hacking in this code and have made silly
> errors. It mostly seemed consistent with how the forknum error is reported,
> but is not important.

Upon reflection, it occurred to me that I would probably rather have
the chunk offset than the chunk size if this ever trips, so I added
both to the error message. Here's v2.

> No disagreement there, which is why I tried to get it reviewed quickly so it
> can be applied and forgotten about and we can move on to more important
> matters.

Thanks for reviewing.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Add-additional-sanity-checks-when-reading-a-blkre.patch application/octet-stream 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-07-15 15:36:52 Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-07-15 15:35:09 Re: Enforce INSERT RLS checks for FOR PORTION OF leftovers?