From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Page Scan Mode in Hash Index |
Date: | 2017-09-21 04:00:12 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ4UOtEy5bkxsRkgjn=DwxAN0RHf=aWMUQpmVg+6EPEKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached are the patches with above changes. Thanks.
Thanks. I think that the comments and README changes in 0003 need
significantly more work. In several places, they fail to note the
unlogged vs. logged differences, and the header comment for
hashbucketcleanup still says that scans depend on increasing-TID order
(really, 0001 should change that text somehow).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-09-21 04:55:27 | Re: Page Scan Mode in Hash Index |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-21 03:42:46 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |