Re: Page Scan Mode in Hash Index

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Page Scan Mode in Hash Index
Date: 2017-09-21 04:00:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ4UOtEy5bkxsRkgjn=DwxAN0RHf=aWMUQpmVg+6EPEKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached are the patches with above changes. Thanks.

Thanks. I think that the comments and README changes in 0003 need
significantly more work. In several places, they fail to note the
unlogged vs. logged differences, and the header comment for
hashbucketcleanup still says that scans depend on increasing-TID order
(really, 0001 should change that text somehow).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-09-21 04:55:27 Re: Page Scan Mode in Hash Index
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-21 03:42:46 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables