Re: Missing XLOG_DEBUG check in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer()?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing XLOG_DEBUG check in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer()?
Date: 2015-06-12 13:28:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ+qiOoNzRi0LCNBhB6iQohfWYJhaWja8NWkwtPY+tzyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/3977E000
> DEBUG: initialized 9 pages, upto 40/39790000
> DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39792000
> DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39794000
> DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39796000
> DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39798000
> I find that quite annoying. That specific elog() has been there since
> 9a20a9b21 in 9.4.
>
> Does somebody mind me backpatching the missing XLOG_DEBUG &&?

While you're at it, maybe you should s/upto/up to/.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-06-12 13:31:49 git push hook to check for outdated timestamps
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-12 13:22:42 Re: On columnar storage