Re: Corruption during WAL replay

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, deniel1495(at)mail(dot)ru, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, tejeswarm(at)hotmail(dot)com, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Wood <hexexpert(at)comcast(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date: 2022-03-25 13:22:04
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYzyeD+WUV2m6a18p-w8hsGqAV+t7zkMHvSueA1tBeLrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 2:07 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> We really ought to find a way to get to wider checksums :/

Eh, let's just use longer names for the buildfarm animals and call it good. :-)

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-03-25 13:22:53 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-03-25 13:21:08 Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table