Re: Corruption during WAL replay

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: deniel1495(at)mail(dot)ru, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, tejeswarm(at)hotmail(dot)com, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Wood <hexexpert(at)comcast(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date: 2022-03-24 19:33:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYqgB8NjTgw6pZsA-RVo4qF8i9CPfqK07sjs6DLGCDf6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:21 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Finally, no two of from 10 to 14 doesn't accept the same patch.
>
> As a cross-version check, I compared all combinations of the patches
> for two adjacent versions and confirmed that no hunks are lost.
>
> All versions pass check world.

Thanks, committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-03-24 19:46:09 Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-03-24 19:32:54 pgsql: Fix possible recovery trouble if TRUNCATE overlaps a checkpoint.