Re: Corruption during WAL replay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, deniel1495(at)mail(dot)ru, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, tejeswarm(at)hotmail(dot)com, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Wood <hexexpert(at)comcast(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date: 2022-03-24 22:04:45
Message-ID: 3152696.1648159485@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks, committed.

Some of the buildfarm is seeing failures in the pg_checksums test.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2022-03-24 22:38:15 Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2022-03-24 22:01:29 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences