| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
| Date: | 2016-11-14 15:50:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYiJHBQqqP6uKkXwNJnzzH4tz1SwGGygW-q-ztoooJw8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'm very tempted to rename this during the move to GUCs
...
> Slightly less so, but still tempted to also rename these. They're not
> actually necessarily pointing towards a primary, and namespace-wise
> they're not grouped with recovery_*, which has become more important now
> that recovery.conf isn't a separate namespace anymore.
-1 for renaming these. I don't think the current names are
particularly bad, and I think trying to agree on what would be better
could easily sink the whole patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-14 16:00:49 | Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP] |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-14 15:49:04 | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |