Re: Question / requests.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question / requests.
Date: 2016-10-03 20:27:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbe9bm=ExUHe30UNjvhtvSukoAfXmk_GzcLoU9R8RBhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
<folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> wrote:
> After some messages due to vacuumdb auto-deadlocking itself on the
> system tables when doing paralell vacuum of a full database I
> suggested adding some flags to make vacuumdb process schemas. I was
> asked wether I could write a patch for that and I am thinking on doing
> it.

What messages are you seeing, exactly? "auto-deadlocking" isn't a thing.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emrul 2016-10-03 20:30:31 Re: Learning to hack Postgres - Keeping track of ctids
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-03 20:26:32 Re: Learning to hack Postgres - Keeping track of ctids