Re: Question / requests.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question / requests.
Date: 2016-10-03 21:44:16
Message-ID: 20161003214416.GA597461@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
> <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> wrote:
> > After some messages due to vacuumdb auto-deadlocking itself on the
> > system tables when doing paralell vacuum of a full database I
> > suggested adding some flags to make vacuumdb process schemas. I was
> > asked wether I could write a patch for that and I am thinking on doing
> > it.
>
> What messages are you seeing, exactly? "auto-deadlocking" isn't a thing.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57EBC9AE.2060302%40163.com

I wonder if the real answer isn't just to disallow -f with parallel
vacuuming.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-10-03 21:55:24 pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous
Previous Message Gilles Darold 2016-10-03 21:23:56 Re: proposal: psql \setfileref