Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]
Date: 2016-11-29 17:51:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYaCDYyB_rv3FUoFUAA-aVf3q1xvwB=_4xK84Hx5w+eWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Actually we want to call slot_getattr instead heap_getattr, because of
> problem mentioned by Andres upthread and we also saw in test results.

Ah, right.

> Should we make a copy of HeapKeyTest lets say ExecKeyTest and keep it
> under executor ?

Sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-11-29 17:58:42 Re: GiST support for UUIDs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-29 17:50:31 Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]