| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables not working as expected |
| Date: | 2017-08-25 13:26:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYWuLVSEe0-m9fSBvEmOtCWqZk3nG2Qhw+ENd_MB1j=OQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Agreed, but I'd vote for fixing this in v10 as proposed; I agree that just
> ripping the CheckValidResultRel checks out entirely is not a good idea, but
> that seems OK to me at least as a fix just for v10.
I'm still not on-board with having this be the one case where we don't
do CheckValidResultRel. If we want to still call it but pass down
some additional information that can selectively skip certain checks,
I could probably live with that.
At some point we've got to stop developing v10 and just let it be what it is.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Ullrich | 2017-08-25 13:27:15 | Re: visual studio 2017 build support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-25 13:24:02 | Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery |