Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevanladhe(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2022-02-11 15:01:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYUDEJga2qV_XbAZ=pGEBaOsgFmzZ6Ac4_sRwOm_+UeHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 7:20 AM Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Sure, please find the rebased patch attached.
>
> Thanks, I have validated v2 patch on top of rebased patch.

I'm still feeling brave, so I committed this too after fixing a few
things. In the process I noticed that we don't have support for LZ4
compression of streamed WAL (cf. CreateWalTarMethod). It would be good
to fix that. I'm not quite sure whether
http://postgr.es/m/pm1bMV6zZh9_4tUgCjSVMLxDX4cnBqCDGTmdGlvBLHPNyXbN18x_k00eyjkCCJGEajWgya2tQLUDpvb2iIwlD22IcUIrIt9WnMtssNh-F9k=@pm.me
is basically what we need or whether something else is required.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2022-02-11 15:05:25 Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-02-11 14:59:55 Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc