| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu> |
| Subject: | Re: Timeout parameters |
| Date: | 2019-03-14 14:03:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYROiSfCm2s7t2=6yeT2zYmBwiUKj0Zqet9ihUL9Ox5iA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
One other thing -- I looked a bit into the pgsql-jdbc implementation
of a similarly-named option, and it does seem to match what you are
proposing here. I wonder what user experiences with that option have
been like.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thibaut | 2019-03-14 14:10:53 | Re: Problem with default partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2019-03-14 13:59:28 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |