| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
| Date: | 2021-07-27 15:27:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYF6EtxXQ8Z5w=rOHesOs9sG6HHL5ikrbV3hS=KoFG7zQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:24 AM Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Isn’t this backwards? If all those roles are members of "tenant" then they can do anything "tenant" can do. The reverse might work - make "tenant" a member of all the related roles - although I haven’t thought through in detail.
Dang it, yes. The tenant needs to be members of all the other users,
not the other way around. I spent a long time trying to not get that
backwards and still did.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-07-27 15:29:58 | Re: Reduce the number of special cases to build contrib modules on windows |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-07-27 15:20:21 | Re: Fix around conn_duration in pgbench |