Re: FailedAssertion on partprune

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FailedAssertion on partprune
Date: 2018-08-02 17:56:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYDvFj5=25sxi1zNUSQaMnR+R7ieDoLC9JH9FZzBc1VvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> (EXPLAIN isn't a very adequate tool for testing this, since
> it fails to show anything about what pruning tests are attached to an
> Append. I wonder if we need to create something that does show that.)

I've asked for that more than once and still think it's a good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-08-02 17:56:22 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-08-02 17:54:39 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?