Re: Rename 'lpp' to 'lp' in heapam.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yaphters W <yaphters(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rename 'lpp' to 'lp' in heapam.c
Date: 2023-05-03 14:48:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYCWYP0Y4KfzpnOGJrSHwD5uR4ngRp9okEx0q6=gNwsDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 10:18 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't really agree that one is any more correct than the other. I
> also don't think we should be making changes like this as doing this
> may give some false impression that we have some standard to follow
> here that a local variable of a given type must be given a certain
> name. To comply with such a standard seems like it would take close to
> an endless number of patches which would just result in wasted
> reviewer and committer time and give us nothing but pain while back
> patching.
>
> -1 from me.

I agree with David. This seems like pointless code churn.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-05-03 15:29:14 Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-05-03 13:20:28 Re: issue with meson builds on msys2