Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date: 2017-03-27 14:40:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY2G7NgkCSafQ32hLaA77zbK9g3c6MPfsGr=Czhw1bivA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>>> I updated the patch. Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in
>>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on
>>>> partitioned tables at all.
>>>
>>> This patch no longer applies.
>>
>> Rebased patch is attached.
>
> Oops, really attached this time,

Committed with a bit of wordsmithing of the documentation.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2017-03-27 14:40:25 Re: rename pg_log directory?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-27 14:38:05 Re: rename pg_log directory?