Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date: 2017-03-10 00:20:51
Message-ID: 80a4672e-fddf-ceff-d53c-59322ac6fbea@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> I updated the patch. Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in
>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on
>>> partitioned tables at all.
>>
>> This patch no longer applies.
>
> Rebased patch is attached.

Oops, really attached this time,

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-ON-CONFLICT-DO-NOTHING-should-work-with-partitioned-.patch text/x-diff 4.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-03-10 00:23:43 Re: contrib modules and relkind check
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-10 00:19:37 pgsql: Fix hard-coded relkind constants in pg_dump.c.