Re: multi-column range partition constraint

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Olaf Gawenda <olaf(dot)gw(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: multi-column range partition constraint
Date: 2017-05-13 02:01:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY1mPP==S5STmtg8AE3kfnoXmo-dxNBN45axamg81fSDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Fixed.
>
> This seems to be the same patch version as last time, so none of the
> things you mention as fixed are, in fact, fixed.

We are kind of running out of time here before beta1, but Amit thinks
he can get the correct patch posted within about 24 hours, so I'm
going to wait for that to happen rather than trying to revise his
previous version myself. Hence, next update tomorrow. Argh.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-13 02:58:49 Re: Addition of pg_dump --no-publications
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-05-13 01:56:30 Re: Hash Functions