Re: multi-column range partition constraint

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Olaf Gawenda <olaf(dot)gw(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: multi-column range partition constraint
Date: 2017-05-13 04:42:01
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGhiDUm2iu5Cw7JNxwYMDi-wvBSoFUZTXbpOBpg0KqWzA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Fixed.
>>
>> This seems to be the same patch version as last time, so none of the
>> things you mention as fixed are, in fact, fixed.

Really sorry about the mix-up.

> We are kind of running out of time here before beta1, but Amit thinks
> he can get the correct patch posted within about 24 hours, so I'm
> going to wait for that to happen rather than trying to revise his
> previous version myself. Hence, next update tomorrow. Argh.

Attached is the correct version.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Emit-correct-range-partition-constraint-expression.patch application/octet-stream 36.6 KB
0002-Add-pg_get_partition_constraintdef.patch application/octet-stream 18.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-13 04:52:10 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-05-13 03:06:46 Re: Hash Functions