| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 |
| Date: | 2020-04-14 19:13:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY17rZ9ytwci_odp36JmJzNTpP6F8pkACVFnoBYasY77Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:23 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 07:55:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Oh, hmm. Maybe I'm getting confused with a previous version of the
> > patch that behaved differently.
>
> No problem. If you prefer keeping this part of the code, that's fine
> by me. If you think that the patch is suited as-is, including
> silencing the error forcing to use --no-manifest on server versions
> older than v13, I am fine to help out and apply it myself, but I am
> also fine if you wish to take care of it by yourself.
Feel free to go ahead.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-14 19:19:07 | Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? |
| Previous Message | Teja Mupparti | 2020-04-14 19:04:07 | Re: Corruption during WAL replay |