Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12
Date: 2020-04-14 00:23:05
Message-ID: 20200414002305.GA1492@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 07:55:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Oh, hmm. Maybe I'm getting confused with a previous version of the
> patch that behaved differently.

No problem. If you prefer keeping this part of the code, that's fine
by me. If you think that the patch is suited as-is, including
silencing the error forcing to use --no-manifest on server versions
older than v13, I am fine to help out and apply it myself, but I am
also fine if you wish to take care of it by yourself.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-04-14 01:01:51 Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-04-13 23:55:07 Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12