Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date: 2023-12-05 16:16:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY+FY-Sf87xrjZ4yEUAPe3HdsYBQZWGP7zaxAp4cr2csw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:35 AM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> Notwithstanding any dragons there may be, and not having actually looked
> at the the patches, I love the concept! +<many>

Seems fine to me too. I haven't looked at the patches or searched for
dragons either, though.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-12-05 16:22:14 Re: CREATE FUNCTION ... SEARCH { DEFAULT | SYSTEM | SESSION }
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-12-05 15:54:58 Re: Detecting some cases of missing backup_label