Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers
Date: 2015-12-02 08:53:07
Message-ID: CA+OCxozk5HT+kL0hbFMXvQH30F-pwCDaC8TqZ0ZJZR_qbDnstg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
>> > together?
>>
>> See
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de
>
> True, but the current license is unchanged and has the advertising
> clause, which I think we have to honor if we ship OpenSSL:
>
> https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
>
> I assume Windows has to ship OpenSSL with the installer and has to abide
> by this, for example. OSX might have to do the same. It might be good
> to see what we do for Windows packages.

We already do it for all our installers - Windows, OSX and Linux. We
have to, otherwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries
would run on all the different supported versions.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-12-02 08:55:14 find_inheritance_children() and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
Previous Message Kouhei Kaigai 2015-12-02 08:52:20 Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)